Now 10426 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 174049 216S 51P 6R
2026-10-22, Week 43
Member Login
TACT Journal Homepage
Call for Paper
Committee
Find My Paper
Author Homepage
Statistics & History
Welcome Message
Paper Procedure
FAQ
Paper Archives
Outstanding Papers
Program & Proceedings
Presentation Platform
Hotel & Travel Info
Photo Gallery
Scheduler Login
Seminar
Archives Login
Sponsors


















Online Q&A Session
Paper Number Author:
Paper Title
Keyword
Q&A Number **Select your question number !!
Questioner eMail:
Question
Answer
by
Author
Save Q&A

* Edit or answer any Q&A by selecting Q&A number Hyper Link below + Write button (Save)
ICACT20250133 Question.1
Questioner: luabt@viettel.com.vn    2025-02-12 오전 1:00:25 		ICACT20250133 Answer.1
Answer by Auhor benjikone@yahoo.fr   2025-02-12 오전 1:00:25
Chrome Click!!
In dynamic control feature, it said that the algorithm will alloc maximum authorised. This could lead to over-commit total bandwidth allocated over physical bandwidth. Plus, this could lead to concurrency among user streams. How could your algorithm balance QoS in high load situations? You raise a key point: allocating the maximum allowed could, in theory, lead to over-allocation and create competition between user flows. To avoid this, our algorithm applies several strategies. Firstly, it monitors network status in real time and dynamically adjusts allocation to avoid exceeding physical capacity. Secondly, we use a prioritization mechanism: critical flows are always given priority over less sensitive flows, guaranteeing stable QoS. What's more, our system includes adaptive throttling to prevent a single flow from exhausting resources during periods of high demand. Finally, thanks to SDN orchestration, we can dynamically redistribute the load on the network, minimizing the risk of congestion.