Now 13331 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 174826 216S 51P 5R
2026-10-21, Week 43
Member Login
TACT Journal Homepage
Call for Paper
Committee
Find My Paper
Author Homepage
Statistics & History
Welcome Message
Paper Procedure
FAQ
Paper Archives
Outstanding Papers
Program & Proceedings
Presentation Platform
Hotel & Travel Info
Photo Gallery
Scheduler Login
Seminar
Archives Login
Sponsors




















Paper Number Author:
Paper Title
Keyword
Q&A Number **Select your question number !!
Questioner eMail:
Question
Answer
by
Author
Save Q&A

* Edit or answer any Q&A by selecting Q&A number Hyper Link below + Write button (Save)
ICACT20250175 Question.1
Questioner: ammarnabil23050@gmail.com    2025-02-16 ¿ÀÈÄ 11:39:58
ICACT20250175 Answer.1
Answer by Auhor 965491454@qq.com   2025-02-16 ¿ÀÈÄ 11:39:58
Chrome Click!!
You presented an analysis of different attack and defense strategies using the Nash equilibrium model. Could you elaborate on how the strategic costs associated with both attack and defense influence the choice of strategies in this game framework? Additionally, what challenges might arise when applying these strategies in real-world warfare scenarios? Thank you for your question. When the attack cost of attackers increases, conservative attackers are more inclined to not attack. Because conservative attackers have a lower probability of success in their attacks, they are no longer cost-effective when the cost increases. When the defense cost of defenders increases, the probability of advanced defenders defending decreases because defenders can benefit even if their defense fails. In practical applications, multi-stage dynamic games are more common. Currently, this study only focuses on static games and will be conducted in future research to meet practical application needs