Now 6200 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 152378 212S 50P 4R
2026-10-20, Week 43
Member Login
TACT Journal Homepage
Call for Paper
Committee
Find My Paper
Author Homepage
Statistics & History
Welcome Message
Paper Procedure
FAQ
Paper Archives
Outstanding Papers
Program & Proceedings
Presentation Platform
Hotel & Travel Info
Photo Gallery
Scheduler Login
Seminar
Archives Login
Sponsors




















Paper Number Author:
Paper Title
Keyword
Q&A Number **Select your question number !!
Questioner eMail:
Question
Answer
by
Author
Save Q&A

* Edit or answer any Q&A by selecting Q&A number Hyper Link below + Write button (Save)
ICACT20260299 Question.1
Questioner: maho.hoshiai@gmail.com    2026-02-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 4:41:53
ICACT20260299 Answer.1
Answer by Auhor liuchang0118@bit.edu.cn   2026-02-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 4:41:53
Chrome Click!!
Your framework mainly relies on CST-based simulated RCS and echo data. How do you plan to quantitatively evaluate and reduce the simulation-to-real gap when applying the model to real measured radar data?
ICACT20260299 Question.2
Questioner: maho.hoshiai@gmail.com    2026-02-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 4:42:30
ICACT20260299 Answer.2
Answer by Auhor liuchang0118@bit.edu.cn   2026-02-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 4:42:30
Chrome Click!!
Compared to a purely data-driven approach trained on large-scale real radar datasets, how much performance gain does the physics-guided modeling actually provide? Have you conducted any comparative experiments?
ICACT20260299 Question.3
Questioner: maho.hoshiai@gmail.com    2026-02-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 4:43:04
ICACT20260299 Answer.3
Answer by Auhor liuchang0118@bit.edu.cn   2026-02-12 ¿ÀÈÄ 4:43:04
Chrome Click!!
You mentioned that the model has good potential for real-time applications. Could you provide more details about the computational cost, such as inference time or model size?