ICACT20210176 Question.1
Questioner: abdulfuadrahman@gmail.com 2021-02-09 오전 10:15:41 |
ICACT20210176 Answer.1
Answer by Auhor debiii@naver.com 2021-02-09 오전 10:15:41
Chrome  Click!! |
| Thank you for the slides. May I know what is the contribution of this research? |
Thank you for watching for the PPT. You can classify malicious codes more effectively. So it is simpler and faster than conventional tests. |
ICACT20210176 Question.2
Questioner: kbchawal@kmitl.ac.th 2021-02-10 오전 11:17:04 |
ICACT20210176 Answer.2
Answer by Auhor debiii@naver.com 2021-02-10 오전 11:17:04
Chrome Click!! |
| I have one question. Would you introduce the environment or platform used for the learning and experimenting in your study? |
Thank you, good question. The environment used recursive calls using Python. It is easy to search the directory for modified files. |
ICACT20210176 Question.3
Questioner: hjcho1@korea.ac.kr 2021-02-10 오전 11:22:41 |
ICACT20210176 Answer.3
Answer by Auhor debiii@naver.com 2021-02-10 오전 11:22:41
Chrome Click!! |
| You said that it is an APT attack response system. But in the presentation, it seems that the performance is compared only with malicious code. Did you develop the tool by referring to the APT scenario? And if you only test the modified program, isn't it reasonable to compare the performance with similar vaccines? I wonder if there is no such vaccine. |
Thank you, good question. I think performance is an indicator of response and that domestic vaccines are still being tested inefficiently. it would be more effective if only suspicious and malicious files were scanned, except for safe files. |
