Now 6886 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 154684 216S 51P 5R
2026-10-22, Week 43
Member Login
TACT Journal Homepage
Call for Paper
Committee
Find My Paper
Author Homepage
Statistics & History
Welcome Message
Paper Procedure
FAQ
Paper Archives
Outstanding Papers
Program & Proceedings
Presentation Platform
Hotel & Travel Info
Photo Gallery
Scheduler Login
Seminar
Archives Login
Sponsors




















Paper Number Author:
Paper Title
Keyword
Q&A Number **Select your question number !!
Questioner eMail:
Question
Answer
by
Author
Save Q&A

* Edit or answer any Q&A by selecting Q&A number Hyper Link below + Write button (Save)
ICACT20250229 Question.1
Questioner: 965491454@qq.com    2025-02-18 ¿ÀÈÄ 9:55:06
ICACT20250229 Answer.1
Answer by Auhor bozhiwang@whu.edu.cn   2025-02-18 ¿ÀÈÄ 9:55:06
Chrome Click!!
In practical radar signal processing, real-time performance is an important consideration. How does your method perform in terms of real-time processing? In practical radar signal processing, the real - time performance of our proposed method is quite good. The blind source separation (BSS) technique used in our method, such as the SOBI method adopted in the experiment, has been proven to be efficient in separating mixed radar signals. It can quickly isolate single - radar - signal pulse flows from the signals received by a one - dimensional uniform antenna array. The subsequent processing steps, including Hilbert transform, envelope extraction, and waveform shaping, are designed in a relatively straightforward and computationally - efficient manner. For example, the threshold - setting method based on a fixed percentage of the envelope amplitude simplifies the operation. In the experiment, with a reasonable number of antenna array elements ($M = 5$) and radars ($K = 5$), and a sampling frequency of $300$ MHz, the method can accurately estimate the PRI. In real - world scenarios, although the signal environment may be more complex, the basic processing framework of our method is scalable. We can further optimize the algorithm by using parallel computing techniques on modern high - performance GPUs. This will significantly reduce the processing time, enabling the method to meet the real - time requirements of practical radar signal processing.
ICACT20250229 Question.2
Questioner: ammarnabil23050@gmail.com    2025-02-18 ¿ÀÈÄ 9:57:01
ICACT20250229 Answer.2
Answer by Auhor bozhiwang@whu.edu.cn   2025-02-18 ¿ÀÈÄ 9:57:01
Chrome Click!!
You mentioned the use of a floating threshold method to shape the signal envelope into rectangular pulse trains. Could you elaborate on how the choice of this threshold impacts the accuracy of the PRI estimation? Specifically, are there any challenges related to selecting the optimal threshold value in varying signal conditions? The choice of the floating threshold significantly impacts the accuracy of PRI estimation. When the threshold is set too low, the shaped rectangular pulse train may contain excessive noise-induced "false pulses." These false pulses will lead to incorrect identification of pulse arrival and end times, thus distorting the calculated PRI values. For example, in a scenario with high - intensity background noise, if the threshold is set at a value close to the noise level, noise spikes could be misinterpreted as valid pulse signals. Conversely, if the threshold is set too high, some weak but valid pulses might be missed. In a multi - radar environment where signals from different radars have varying intensities, setting a high threshold could cause the loss of pulses from weaker radars. This would result in an incomplete set of pulse data for PRI calculation, leading to inaccurate PRI estimation. In varying signal conditions, selecting the optimal threshold indeed poses challenges. Signal - to - noise ratio (SNR) can change rapidly in real - world scenarios. To address this, we can implement an adaptive threshold - setting algorithm. For instance, we can calculate the statistical characteristics of the received signal in real - time, such as the mean and variance of the signal envelope amplitude. Based on these statistics, we can adjust the threshold proportionally. In a high - SNR environment, the threshold can be set relatively higher to filter out potential noise, while in a low - SNR environment, the threshold can be adjusted lower to ensure that weak signals are not overlooked. This way, we can maintain the accuracy of PRI estimation across different signal conditions.