Now 5233 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 147758
212S 50P 4R
2026-10-20, Week 43 |
| Member Login |
| TACT Journal Homepage |
| Call for Paper |
| Committee |
| Find My Paper |
| Author Homepage |
| Statistics & History |
| Welcome Message |
| Paper Procedure |
| FAQ |
| Paper Archives |
| Outstanding Papers |
| Author Homepage |
| - Paper Procedure |
| - Journal Procedure |
| - Presentation Tips |
|
| Program & Proceedings |
| Program with Papers |
| Plenary Session |
| Tutorial Session |
|
| Presentation Platform |
| Hotel & Travel Info |
| About Korea |
| Accommodation |
| Transportation |
| VISA |
| Other Infomation |
|
| Photo Gallery |
| Scheduler Login |
| Seminar |
| Archives Login |
|
| Sponsors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Save Q&A |
 |
* Edit or answer any Q&A by selecting Q&A number Hyper Link below + Write button (Save)
|
ICACT20260314 Question.1
Questioner: gonghao23@mails.ucas.ac.cn 2026-02-23 오후 11:09:59 |
ICACT20260314 Answer.1
Answer by Auhor f.ozgur.catak@uis.no 2026-02-23 오후 11:09:59
Chrome  Click!! |
| Generalization under Realistic Channel Conditions: The experiments are conducted solely on the RML2016.10a dataset under simulated interference with SNR ranging from -6dB to 18dB. How would the three attention mechanisms perform under more realistic channel impairments such as multipath fading, Doppler shifts, or hardware imperfections — and would the computational advantages of causal and sparse attention still hold in such settings? |
|
ICACT20260314 Question.2
Questioner: gonghao23@mails.ucas.ac.cn 2026-02-23 오후 11:10:20 |
ICACT20260314 Answer.2
Answer by Auhor f.ozgur.catak@uis.no 2026-02-23 오후 11:10:20
Chrome Click!! |
| Adaptive Attention Selection Strategy: The paper suggests a "mixed deployment" approach where attention mechanisms are dynamically selected based on signal characteristics. What criteria or lightweight signal features (e.g., estimated SNR, detected modulation family) could be used to trigger this selection in real time, and how would the overhead of such a decision module affect the overall inference latency gains reported for causal (83%) and sparse (75%) attention? |
|
| |
