 |
As shown in the results table, for each experiment, 13 trials were conducted and the average F1-score was calculated. The first experiment on PCB Type number 2 confirmed that the Dinomaly model outperformed the PaDiM model by over 17.5 percent, achieving an F1-score of 98.5 percent compared to PaDiM¡¯s 81 percent. In the second experiment involving PCB Type number 1 and PCB Type number 3, the Dinomaly model achieved F1-scores of 99.5 percent and 98.5 percent, respectively. The average performance across the three PCB experiments was approximately 98.8 percent. |
IEEE/ICACT20260190 Slide.16
[Big Slide]