|
Fig.3 illustrates a comparative analysis of the average response time for eight algorithms across various task sizes, highlighting ACOCSA's superior performance. Leveraging its hybrid approach, ACOCSA consistently achieves shorter response times, particularly for large-scale tasks, outperforming other algorithms such as MLVM, PAVM, and GIJA, and demonstrating its efficiency and scalability in dynamic environments.Fig.4 provides a comparison of the average completion time across various algorithms, showcasing ACOCSA's superior performance. ACOCSA consistently achieves shorter completion times for all task sizes, completing 100 tasks in 46 seconds compared to 51 and 53 seconds for GIJA and AOA, respectively. This highlights ACOCSA's efficiency in optimizing task processing and its scalability in handling large workloads effectively.
|