www.icact.org

Member Login

TACT Journal Homepage

Call for Paper

Committee

Find My Paper

Author Homepage

Statistics & History

Welcome Message

Paper Procedure

FAQ

Paper Archives

Outstanding Papers

Program & Proceedings

Presentation Platform

Hotel & Travel Info

Photo Gallery

Scheduler Login

Seminar

Archives Login

Sponsors

Virual Oral Question and Answer


IEEE/ICACT20250032 Question.1 Questioner: jianms@nfu.edu.tw 2025-02-14 오후 3:25:30	IEEE/ICACT20250032 Answer.1 Answer by Auhor mamadouba92@gmail.com 2025-02-14 오후 3:25:30
since the real time data is desired for remote health monitoring, could you comapring that using the wearable device for 4G or 5G LET communication for the health data transmission with your system?	The Fledge-based system offers significant advantages over direct 4G/5G transmission from wearable devices: it enables local data pre-processing which reduces latency and network load, ensures better reliability through local storage and processing capabilities when connectivity issues arise, and provides enhanced multi-level security. However, a direct 4G/5G solution has the advantage of being simpler to deploy (without fog computing infrastructure), offers greater mobility, and direct cloud connectivity. The choice between these two approaches will therefore depend on the specific project needs - Fledge being more suitable for complex medical monitoring requiring local processing and enhanced security, while direct 4G/5G transmission is better suited for basic remote monitoring.

Select Voice