www.icact.org

Member Login

TACT Journal Homepage

Call for Paper

Committee

Find My Paper

Author Homepage

Statistics & History

Welcome Message

Paper Procedure

FAQ

Paper Archives

Outstanding Papers

Program & Proceedings

Presentation Platform

Hotel & Travel Info

Photo Gallery

Scheduler Login

Seminar

Archives Login

Sponsors

Virual Oral Question and Answer


IEEE/ICACT20220402 Question.3 Questioner: 20180922@sungshin.ac.kr 2022-02-16 오전 11:37:14	IEEE/ICACT20220402 Answer.3 Answer by Auhor namacabale@gmail.com 2022-02-16 오전 11:37:14
Thank you for presenting an interesting topic. The worst-case scenario of CLM is explained as when there is no interference traffic at the center, is the reason why it is the worst condition because CLM-based routing does not go through the center or because there is a delay due to calculation?	Hello. Thank you for finding our work interesting. It is the worst condition because the most apparent reason would be due to routing oscillation. However, we found it more to be due to the inability of the routing algorithm to converge or to its tendency to build routing loops. Simulations show that the routes behaved this way because of the zero or near-zero load weights for idle regions. In this case, when a node sent traffic towards a particular destination, the channel load weights of the regions along the path was relatively far greater than the zero or near-zero load weights of the idle regions. Consequently, the idle regions became better paths. The cost of the paths through the idle regions remained better, even if the route went back and forth in a loop within a set nodes, than the cost of the path where the current traffic was traversing. Thanks again.

Select Voice