Now 3559 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 138450 215S 51P 5R
2026-10-21, Week 43
Member Login
TACT Journal Homepage
Call for Paper
Committee
Find My Paper
Author Homepage
Statistics & History
Welcome Message
Paper Procedure
FAQ
Paper Archives
Outstanding Papers
Program & Proceedings
Presentation Platform
Hotel & Travel Info
Photo Gallery
Scheduler Login
Seminar
Archives Login
Sponsors




















IEEE/ICACT20210156 Question.5
Questioner: Gaohy1105@outlook.com    2021-02-10 ¿ÀÀü 1:34:16
IEEE/ICACT20210156 Answer.5
Answer by Auhor Yiile@outlook.com   2021-02-10 ¿ÀÀü 1:34:16
Thank you for your presentation. Can you give a more detailed introduction to the content of Figure 1? Figure shows that within 12 hours, the average energy consumption of the working virtual machines under the adjustment method proposed in this paper is much lower than that of the control method 1. Because the dynamic optimization method in this paper includes a mode transfer strategy based on energy protection, which transfers cold mode to a physical machine as much as possible, while the control method 1 that has all virtual machines in working state without considering energy savings consumes the most energy. The control method 2 is a traditional backup method that only considers a backup mode (cold mode) which is in sleep state, so that consumes less energy. It is calculated that the proposed strategy in this paper generates an average energy savings of 12.16% compared to the control method 1 and 10.15% compared to the control method 2.

Select Voice