Now 5463 visitors
Today:0 Yesterday:0
Total: 149053 216S 51P 5R
2026-10-22, Week 43
Member Login
TACT Journal Homepage
Call for Paper
Committee
Find My Paper
Author Homepage
Statistics & History
Welcome Message
Paper Procedure
FAQ
Paper Archives
Outstanding Papers
Program & Proceedings
Presentation Platform
Hotel & Travel Info
Photo Gallery
Scheduler Login
Seminar
Archives Login
Sponsors




















main_email:zakaria.sawado@gmail.com
Work Method
* Looking though a Presentation Sample (click!!) as the target.
Step.1: Submit a slide (select slide number + upload .jpg + description) + Write button (Save)
Step.2: Review a submitted slide with .jpg and description, and listen text to speech function
Step.3: Any time, edit it by selecting the slide hyper link on top a slide + Write button (Save)
*Give it a try right away!!

Paper Number
Paper Title
Keyword
Online Presentation * Submit YouTube URL: Compulsory for online participant!
Slide Number * Upload slide file one by one, Notice: .jpg(O) .JPG(X), click -> diapo7.jpg  
* Min. 20 ~ Max. 40 slides!!
Slide Display
Verbal Description
*Must fill up in details as much as you can do!
Save the slide and description

*** You can edit any slide by selecting the Slide number below***

ICACT20220050 Slide.17        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Thank you for your attention

ICACT20220050 Slide.16        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
We present an excerpt from our literature review

ICACT20220050 Slide.15        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
We thank PASET-RSIF for their financial support of our work

ICACT20220050 Slide.14        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
In this paper, we evaluated eleven classification algorithms based on the performance obtained by the commonly used metrics and by the balancing metric. This study allows us to assert, as shown by the results, that some algorithms are less suitable for imbalanced datasets. We have also shown that the metrics commonly used in the literature are not always suitable. Metrics such as balanced accuracy and Geometric mean are more suitable for imbalanced dataset

ICACT20220050 Slide.13        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
We have also shown that the metrics Commonly used in the literature are not always suitable for imbalanced data. In addition, the accuracy values with balanced datasets are approximate to those obtained with balanced accuracy for imbalanced datasets. We show that inappropriate use of evaluation metrics and imbalanced data sets results in flattering performance

ICACT20220050 Slide.12        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Figure 6 and 7 show us the performance obtained with the balanced metrics. We see a decrease in performance with the use of balanced data, but this is less than with the standard metrics in Figures 4 and 5.

ICACT20220050 Slide.11        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Looking at Figure 4 and Figure 5, we can see that the performance of the metrics decreases with the use of balanced data. This decrease in performance is more important for the accuracy metric.

ICACT20220050 Slide.10        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
We have considered two types of metrics for the evaluation of the models produced by the different algorithms: The standard metrics: Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F 1-Score. Balanced metrics: Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), Balanced accuracy (BA), Geometric Mean (GM) and Fowlkes-Mallows (FM)

ICACT20220050 Slide.09        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
We used an imbalanced and balanced multi-class dataset. We selected eleven classification algorithms for our experiment.

ICACT20220050 Slide.08        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
In figure 3, we have the proportions of use of metrics. Accuracy is the most used metric with 68%.

ICACT20220050 Slide.07        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Figure 1, shows us that more than 77% of the papers use unbalanced data sets. Figure 2, shows us that the size of the data is relatively small.

ICACT20220050 Slide.06        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
1. We have selected papers from the literature that address the detection or classification of malicious android applications. 2. For each paper, we looked at : the size of the dataset used whether the dataset is unbalanced or not the metrics used to evaluate the model. 3. We constructed two datasets (balanced and unbalanced) to assess the impact on the models

ICACT20220050 Slide.05        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
We have investigated the impact that imbalanced datasets can have on the performance of models produced by ​classification algorithms. we make the following contributions: The sensitivity status of eleven classification algorithms for the detection of android malware Applications with an imbalanced dataset. The analysis of the most suitable evaluation metrics for imbalanced dataset

ICACT20220050 Slide.04        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Eitrich and Lang ,2006[2] have proposed an approach to efficiently optimize machine learning parameters of support vectors for unbalanced data sets. Pozzolo et al. 2015[3] uses Bayes minimum risk theory to find the correct classification threshold and show how to adjust it after downsampling. From imbalanced data sets, the objective functions used to learn classifiers generally tend to favor larger and less important classes. Amalia et al,2019[4] perform an impact analysis on the performance of unbalanced datasets but focusing on the effects of data resampling. Johnson and Khoshgoftaar 2019 [5]did a survey that highlights various gaps in deep learning from imbalanced data. We are not aware of any work analyzing the impact of imbalanced datasets on machine learning models for detecting malicious android applications. That justifies our contribution.

ICACT20220050 Slide.03        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Detection or classification of malicious applications android uses machine learning. According to Cho et al. these techniques require a large amount of datasets and are balanced between classes , for model training, otherwise the small size of the dataset or the imbalanced datasets affects the effective model training in machine learning. We are not aware of any work analyzing the impact of imbalanced datasets on machine learning models for detecting malware android.

ICACT20220050 Slide.02        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
The outline of the presentation will be as follow We start with the Context and the Problem. Then some related works and our Contributions. After that we present our approach to the investigation followed by the experimental process next, we present the results and lastly we conclude

ICACT20220050 Slide.01        [Big slide for presentation]       [YouTube] Chrome Text-to-Speach Click!!
Hello everyone, I am Zakaria Sawadogo, PhD student in Gaston Berger University under the PASET scholarship I am happy to present our work about Android malware detection : Investigating the impact of imbalanced datasets on the performance of machine learning models.